Instruction Designer's Expectation from QE Testing
Important Note: Assume that there is a separate the content QE process that addresses script styles, grammar and other issues for the script and this QE refers primarily to the functionality check.
- There are no missing instruction text.
- Instruction/common text are consistent and accurately written.
- Popups, glossary, resources, jobtools, instruction text, page numbers, slide numbers, coach, tutor and all other course features and attributes function as expected.
- Exceptions are well-addressed.
- Popups, glossary, resources, jobtools, instruction text, page numbers, slide numbers, coach, tutor and all other common course features and attributes have consistent look and feel and reference, for curriculum development.
- The content flow is alignes with the script.
- Reverse flow is well desgned.
- There are no usability concerns - for example, no distinction betweem visited and not visited states.
- Outstanding alpha, beta and other issues are adequately addressed and implemented.
- Image quality and content readability is adequate.
- If image sequence is provided in the script, whether the same sequence is followed in the course.
- If the client requests a global term change, after the course has been produced, whether the change is implemented across the course text, resources, jobtools, quiz and glossary.
- If there is a content change in the course, whether the change is well-effected in the resources, jobtools and quiz.
- For audio files, whether the voice matches with the gender of the character name. For example, Angela is always a female voice.
- For audio files, if the same character is used across the course, whether the voice is also kept consistent for the entire course.
Comments